Yes No Share to Facebook
Claiming Disgorgement Remedy
Involves Taking Benefits or Profits Away From a Wrongdoer
Last Updated: July 02 2026
Question: Can a victim of wrongdoing in Ontario sue for disgorgement even if they did not suffer a financial loss, but the wrongdoer still made a profit or benefit from the wrongdoing?
Answer: Cross Legal Services can help Ontario consumers understand when a court may order disgorgement or other restitutionary relief for “profiting from wrong” even where you cannot show a traditional compensable loss, because disgorgement focuses on removing the wrongdoer’s ill gotten gains instead of fully compensating harm; in Pharmascience Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., 2020 ONSC 6534, the court explained that disgorgement may be available where there is an underlying legal wrong and ordinary damages are inadequate, and it is often reserved for breaches of fiduciary duty or trust, but can apply in exceptional cases involving other legal wrongs; if you believe someone benefited from fraud, a breach of trust, or another misconduct with limited or no measurable loss, call (289) 443-0675 to discuss your situation with a paralegal at Cross Legal Services.
Is There a Type of Legal Compensation Available From a Wrongdoer Who Profits From a Wrongdoing?
When a Wrongdoer Benefits or Profits From a Wrongdoing, the Victim of the Wrongdoing May Claim Disgorgement of the Benefits or Profits From the Wrongdoer.
Understanding Disgorgement Remedy Principles Involving Restitution For Wrongdoings Resulting In Ill Gotten Gains
There are some circumstances in which a wrongdoer receives a benefit or profit from the wrongdoing and yet the victim is without a corresponding harm or loss. Generally, under legal principles akin to no harm, no foul concepts, a legitimate lawsuit permits compensation for the loss or harm suffered by the victim; however, in some circumstances it is proper to claim disgorgement of benefits or profits received by the wrongdoer.
The Law
Disgorgement remedy, as a stripping of ill gotten gains from a wrongdoer, was well explained within the Pharmascience Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., et al, 2020 ONSC 6534, case wherein it was stated:
[19] Under the “profiting from wrong” theory of unjust enrichment, disgorgement may be available if the defendant has committed “an underlying legal wrong against a plaintiff, and the ordinary damages remedy for the underlying wrong is inadequate”. As the Court of Appeal noted, disgorgement in these cases is typically reserved for when there has been a breach of fiduciary duty or a breach of trust. However, in exceptional cases, disgorgement as a restitutionary remedy can also be granted where the “underlying legal wrong” is a crime or a breach of contract or a tort.[6] In cases premised on “profiting from wrong”, the concept of “corresponding deprivation” takes on a slightly different meaning. A plaintiff may be able to prove a corresponding loss by showing that the defendant’s gain was “made possible” by the defendant’s wrongful act towards the plaintiff rather than proving a direct or indirect transfer of wealth.[7]
Explained Principles
There may be circumstances where a person commits a criminal fraud or a civil fraud, among other wrongs, without causing harm or loss to the wronged person and yet benefits or profits arise in favour of the wrongdoer. Courts, seeking to discourage wrongful conduct, may order that the ill gotten gains be disgorged, meaning taken away, from the wrongdoer and granted to the victim. Essentially, disgorgement remedy is used to ensure that a wrongdoer fails to benefit or profit from acts of wrongdoing especially in circumstances where the victim was unharmed, or suffered only little harm, by the misconduct of the wrongdoer.
Summary Comment
Disgorgement is a restitutionary remedy rather than a compensatory remedy, meaning that the law applies disgorgement as a matter of fairness rather than as a matter of making a victim whole for loss or harm suffered by the victim.
NOTE: A significant volume of inquiries featuring “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in” typically indicates a desire for prompt and effective legal assistance rather than a particular job title. In Ontario, the same Law Society that governs lawyers also regulates licensed paralegals, empowering them to represent clients in specified litigation cases. Essential to this role are advocacy, legal analysis, and procedural expertise. Cross Legal Services provides legal representation within its licensed parameters, focusing on strategic positioning, preparation of evidence, and compelling advocacy to secure efficient and beneficial outcomes for clients.
