Claiming Disgorgement Remedy Involves Taking Benefits or Profits Away From a Wrongdoer | Cross Legal Services
Helpful?
Yes No Share to Facebook

Claiming Disgorgement Remedy

Involves Taking Benefits or Profits Away From a Wrongdoer



Last Updated: July 02 2026

Question: Can a victim of wrongdoing in Ontario sue for disgorgement even if they did not suffer a financial loss, but the wrongdoer still made a profit or benefit from the wrongdoing?

Answer: Cross Legal Services can help Ontario consumers understand when a court may order disgorgement or other restitutionary relief for “profiting from wrong” even where you cannot show a traditional compensable loss, because disgorgement focuses on removing the wrongdoer’s ill gotten gains instead of fully compensating harm;   in Pharmascience Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., 2020 ONSC 6534, the court explained that disgorgement may be available where there is an underlying legal wrong and ordinary damages are inadequate, and it is often reserved for breaches of fiduciary duty or trust, but can apply in exceptional cases involving other legal wrongs;   if you believe someone benefited from fraud, a breach of trust, or another misconduct with limited or no measurable loss, call (289) 443-0675 to discuss your situation with a paralegal at Cross Legal Services.

Is There a Type of Legal Compensation Available From a Wrongdoer Who Profits From a Wrongdoing?

When a Wrongdoer Benefits or Profits From a Wrongdoing, the Victim of the Wrongdoing May Claim Disgorgement of the Benefits or Profits From the Wrongdoer.


Understanding Disgorgement Remedy Principles Involving Restitution For Wrongdoings Resulting In Ill Gotten Gains

Claiming Disgorgement Remedy Involves Taking Benefits or Profits Away From a Wrongdoer In some circumstances a wrongdoer may receive a benefit or profit arising from the wrongdoing while little, if any, loss or harm arises to the victim of the wrongdoing. Whereas the law generally forbid a person from suing unless a loss or harm has occurred per no harm, no foul principles, a valid lawsuit may involve claims for the illegitimate benefits or profits arising from the misconduct of the wrongdoer.

The Law

The availability of the remedy of disgorgement was well explained within the case of Pharmascience Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., et al, 2020 ONSC 6534, wherein it was said:


[19]  Under the “profiting from wrong” theory of unjust enrichment, disgorgement may be available if the defendant has committed “an underlying legal wrong against a plaintiff, and the ordinary damages remedy for the underlying wrong is inadequate”. As the Court of Appeal noted, disgorgement in these cases is typically reserved for when there has been a breach of fiduciary duty or a breach of trust. However, in exceptional cases, disgorgement as a restitutionary remedy can also be granted where the “underlying legal wrong” is a crime or a breach of contract or a tort.[6] In cases premised on “profiting from wrong”, the concept of “corresponding deprivation” takes on a slightly different meaning. A plaintiff may be able to prove a corresponding loss by showing that the defendant’s gain was “made possible” by the defendant’s wrongful act towards the plaintiff rather than proving a direct or indirect transfer of wealth.[7]

Explained Principles

Imagine a situation where a person commits a criminal fraud or a civil fraud upon another person.  In some circumstances, the victim may experience little harm or was able to mitigate all or most of the harm that resulted from the fraud and thus little loss, if any occurs; however, the wrongdoer may have significantly benefited or profited from the fraud.  Courts, seeking to discourage wrongful conduct, may order that the ill gotten gains be disgorged, meaning taken away, from the wrongdoer and granted to the victim.  Essentially, disgorgement remedy is used to ensure that a wrongdoer fails to benefit or profit from acts of wrongdoing especially in circumstances where the victim was unharmed, or suffered only little harm, by the misconduct of the wrongdoer.

Summary Comment

Disgorgement is a form of restitution rather than compensation whereas disgorgement is applied in law as a matter of fairness rather than as a means for making whole the losses or harms of a victim.

5

NOTE: A substantial quantity of inquiries featuring “lawyers in my area” or “top lawyer in” frequently indicates a desire for prompt and proficient legal assistance rather than a particular job designation.  In Ontario, certified paralegals are governed by the same Law Society that regulates lawyers and have the authority to represent clients in specified litigation issues.  Skills in advocacy, legal analysis, and procedural expertise are fundamental to this position.  Cross Legal Services provides legal representation within its licensed parameters, focusing on strategic positioning, evidence preparation, and compelling advocacy aimed at securing quick and advantageous outcomes for clients.

AR, BN, CA+|EN, DT, ES, FA, FR, GU, HE, HI
IT, KO, PA, PT, RU, TA, TL, UK, UR, VI, ZH
Send a Message to: Cross Legal Services

NOTE: Do not send confidential details about your case.  Using this website does not establish a legal-representative/client relationship.  Use the website for your introduction with Cross Legal Services. 
Privacy Policy & Cookies | Terms of Use Your IP Address is: 216.73.216.145





Assistive Controls:  |   |  A A A